Речи гитлера Речи гитлера на немецком языке. 1. Германия должна, наконец, согласиться, что так как Россия снова чувствует в свой адрес угрозу со стороны Финляндии, Россия должна иметь возможность ликвидировать Финляндию.

Главная» Новости» Выступление гитлера на немецком текст. О сервисе Прессе Авторские права Связаться с нами Авторам Рекламодателям Разработчикам.

Последняя речь Гитлера в бункере перед смертью. Почему её так долго скрывали от народа

Главная» Новости» Выступление гитлера на немецком текст. Hitler's 1 September 1939 Reichstag speech is a speech made by Adolf Hitler at an Extraordinary Session of the German Reichstag on 1 September 1939, the day of the German invasion of Poland. The speech served as public declaration of war against Poland and thus of the commencement of. Речь гитлера текст. Гитлер 1941 речь. Выступление Гитлера с переводом. Речи гитлера Речи гитлера на немецком языке. Тэги: гитлер, речь, 1933, берлин Канцлер Германии Адольф Гитлер в своем рабочем кабинете. Teкcт выcтyплeния нa нeмeцкoм языкe. Мартин Вютке Речь Гитлера из фильма "Бесславные ублюдки" (Немецкий язык).

"Why We Are Antisemites" - Text of Adolf Hitler's 1920 speech at the Hofbräuhaus

Hitler im Reichstag am 1. September 1939 Quelle: Bundesarchiv Koblenz. Всем историкам третьего рейха давно известно, что Адольфа Гитлера звали Шекель Грубер, а это прямо указывает на его истинное происхождение. О каком немецком нацизме вообще может идти речь если Гитлер был сами понимаете кем. Teкcт выcтyплeния нa нeмeцкoм языкe. Речь гитлера текст. Гитлер 1941 речь. Выступление Гитлера с переводом. Речь Гитлера на немецком. Выступление Гитлера с переводом. выступления гитлера с переводом скачать с видео в MP4, FLV Вы можете скачать M4A аудио формат. The first shots of the invasion had been fired at around 4:48 am of September 1, by the battleship Schleswig-Holstein. At 5:40 am Hitler issued a declaration to the armed forces: "The Polish state has refused the peaceful settlement of relations which I desired, and appealed to arms In order to put an.

Цитаты Гитлера на немецком

И в то время как само советское правительство всегда утверждало, что войска, дескать, были введены по просьбе местного населения Прибалтики, цель их продолжающегося присутствия была демонстрация своей силы Германии. В то время как наши солдаты с 5 мая 1940 года уничтожали англо-французские силы на западе, концентрация советских войск и их манёвры на нашей восточной границе приобретали всё более и более угрожающие размеры. Поэтому, в интересах Германии, я с августа 1940 года уже не мог более позволить нашими восточным провинциям, тем более что они к этому времени вообще зачастую были пустыми, оставаться незащищёнными ввиду беспрецедентного нарастания числа большевистских дивизий. Это всё был результат англо-советской кооперации, направленной на создание на востоке такой мощной армейской группировки, чтобы Германское Командование не смогло бы закончить блицкриг на западе полным разгромом, особенно, что касается в части военно-воздушных сил.

И всё это было в соответствии не только с английской, но и советской политикой; поскольку и Англия, и Советская Россия имели ввиду затягивать войну как можно дольше, чтобы постепенно ослаблять и ослаблять всю Европу и сделать её совсем неспособной. Анализируя, атака СССР на Румынию была также направлена на овладение важной материальной базой не только Германии, но и всеевропейской экономики и, по меньшей мере, имела ввиду разрушить её. Германия, особенно с 1933 года, с непрерывным терпением искала возможности наладить торговлю со странами юго-восточной Европы.

Поэтому мы всегда были заинтересованы во внутреннем спокойствии и внутренней организации этих стран. Советское нападение на Румынию и связка Греции с Англией грозили в короткое время превратить этот регион в театр войны. Прямо противоположно своим принципам и срочной просьбе румынского правительства, которое само несло ответственность именно за такое развитие событий, я советовал им принятие советских требований ради мира и уступку Бессарабии Молдавии.

Румынское правительство, однако, считало, что оно способно отчитаться перед своим народом, только если Германия и Италия в качестве компенсации, по крайне мере, могли бы хоть гарантировать целостность того, что осталось от Румынии. Я согласился на это с тяжёлым сердцем, принципиально, потому что, мы — Германцы, когда даём свои гарантии — мы держим их. Мы не англичане, и не евреи.

Я до последней секунды, хотя и облечённый персональными обязательствами, надеялся на сохранении мира в этом регионе. Для этого, чтобы разрешить эти проблемы и достигнуть ясности в отношениях между Советской Россией и Германией, а также ввиду продолжающейся концентрации советских войск на нашей восточной границе, я пригласил Молотова в Берлин. Советский министр иностранных дел тогда потребовал от Германии разъяснений соглашения по следующим четырём пунктам: 1.

Мой ответ: Германская гарантия имеет общий характер и безусловно накладывает на нас обязанности. Советская Россия, однако, никогда не объявляла нам, что имеет и другие интересы в Румынии за пределами Бессарабии. Уже свершившаяся оккупация советскими войсками Северной Буковины уже вышла за пределы советских уверений, поэтому я не думаю, что Россия на данный момент имеет ещё более далеко идущие намерения против Румынии.

Второй пункт Молотова: Советская Россия опять чувствует угрозу Финляндии. Кремль определённо не может терпеть этого. Готова ли Германия не оказывать помощь Финляндии и, более того, немедленно отозвать германские войска уже находящиеся в Киркенесе?

Но новая война СССР против маленького финского народа уже не может рассматриваться германским правительством как нормальное явление; равно как мы никогда и не поверим, что Финляндия каким-то образом может угрожать СССР. Ни при каких обстоятельствах мы не желаем нового театра войны на Балтике. Третий пункт Молотова: Готова ли Германия согласиться на то, что Советская Россия может предоставить гарантии Болгарии в виде посылки туда своих войск, в связи с чем он — Молотов, готов заверить Германию, что Кремль не будет низлагать короля Болгарии?

Мой ответ: Болгария — это суверенное государство. И я не имею информации, что Болгария когда либо запрашивала Советскую Россию о гарантиях, подобных тем, которые Румыния запросила от Германии. Более того, я не готов ответить на этот вопрос без консультаций со своими союзниками.

Германия согласна или нет? Мой ответ: Германия была всегда готова согласиться на изменение 1936 года Конвенции Монтро в пользу государств Чёрного моря. Германия не готова, чтобы дать согласие Советской России на создание военных баз вдоль проливов.

Национал-социалисты, здесь я был обязан в полном осознании своей ответственности проявить свою позицию как ответственный лидер не только Германии, но и как представитель европейской культуры и цивилизации. Последствием всего этого было возрастание активности Советской России направленной прямо против Германии, и сразу, конкретно, начались новые попытки подрыва румынского государства и попытки посредством пропаганды устранить болгарскую монархию.

This victory was bound up with great efforts, with sacrifices, with deprivations, with unceasing labors, and also with setbacks. And if you had asked anyone on January 15, "Do you believe that this person"-that was I at that time-"will get into power? And now I must mention something else. I told you what I found conditions to be in the year 1919 to 1920, when I brought the party into existence; I have depicted for you the situation, after my first great defeat. But I must recall to your memory, in just a few sentences, what I had taken upon myself on that 30th of January. It was a heritage which hardly anyone wanted any more to take over at all. Everything ruined, the economy destroyed; 7,000,000 people without a living, and it was increasing from week to week; 7,000,000 part-time workers. The Reich finances an enormous deficit of nearly three billions.

The peasantry on the verge of complete collapse, on the verge of having land and soil auctioned off. Trade crippled, commerce brought to a halt, our shipping no longer in existence. In general, everything in Germany seemed now to be dead. But I took that over. It was no bright heritage, but I looked upon it as an honor to take over something not at the moment when it is flourishing, but to take it over at the moment when others say: "Everything is already ruined. Everyone can, of course? It was altogether clear to me that? I would have been beaten to death, I dared and I won. I began to stabilize the German currency by relentless pressure from above. I began, however, to stabilize it so...

German production... All that is easy to tell today, but it was not so easy then, for if it had been so easy, why did my opponents not do it? I immediately began with the repression of all the foreign elements in Germany; I mean our cosmopolites. I began also at this time to bring individual provinces into the Reich. Instead of numberless economic organizations a combination of all in one single bureau. At first, of course, everyone complained whose interests were thereby threatened. But one thing no one can dispute, from either the right or left: In the end everything went better than before. For one thing, my comrades, you must all admit, wherever you come from: Everywhere today you see works of peace which we could no longer continue on account of war. Everywhere you see great buildings, schools, housing projects, which the war has kept us from carrying on. Before I entered upon this war, I had begun a gigantic program of social, economic, cultural work, in part already completed.

But everywhere I had in mind new plans, new projects. When, on the other hand, I look at my opponents, what have they really done, now? They could rush easily enough into war. War did not rob them of a peaceful state, for they have accomplished nothing. This prattler, this drink-bold Churchill, what has he in reality accomplished in his life? This perfidious fellow is a lazybones of the first order. If this war had not come, the centuries would have spoken of our generation and also of all of us and also of myself as the creator of great works of peace. But if this war had not come, who would speak of Churchill? Now he will one day be spoken of, to be sure, but as the destroyer of an empire, which he and now we destroyed. One of the most pitiful phrase-mongering natures of world history, incapable of creating anything, of accomplishing anything, or of performing creative acts, capable only of destroying.

Of his accomplice in the White House I would rather not speak at all, moreover-a wretched madman. To be sure, the more we worked, the more we put Germany in order, the greater grew the hatred, unfortunately. For now there came something in addition. Now came the stupid hatred of the social strata abroad, who believed that the German model, the socialistic German model, could break in on them also, circumstances permitting. I have often heard that those in other countries said themselves: "Well, you know,... I do not even demand at all that they should be carried out. On the contrary, I am not here to concern myself with the happiness of other peoples, but I feel myself responsible exclusively for my own people. That is what I work for. To my sleepless nights I will not add a single one for other lands. Why not?

That only spoils our working class. They do not perceive that the German workingman has worked more than ever before; why should he not then recover? Is it not above all a joke when that man from the White House says: "We have a World Program and this World Program will give mankind freedom and the right to labor. Roosevelt, open your eyes, we have had that in Germany for a long time already. Or when he says that care will be taken of illness. Go and look at the battle-cry of our party program that is National Socialistic, not its doctrine, my dear sir, those are high ideas like those of a Democrat. Or when he says: "We wish to raise the standard of prosperity, even for the masses. Those are prominent things in our program. For we have also done that without a war. You have a war!

No, this capitalistic babble does not even think of doing such a thing. They see in us only the bad example, and in order to tempt their own people, they must meddle in our party program and there snatch out single sentences, these pitiful blunders, and even then they do it badly. We have had a united world against us here, naturally, not only from the right but also from the left, as those on the left say to us, "If that succeeds; this experiment, it actually creates, it brings it about, that it does away with homelessness. It makes it ready and establishes a school system whereby every talented youngster, irrespective of what kind of position. He completes it and makes a lawyer out of a former farm worker. He completed it. Why, we live by the fact that that does not exist. We do live by that. War, then, against this National Socialism. We have now been at the helm for nine years.

This struggle will render the verdict, if this Russia is compared with Germany. What have we created in nine years, what is the aspect of the German people, and what has been created there? I do not even want to talk about the capitalist states, they are not at all concerned about their unemployed for that reason? To the American millionaire the unemployed person is something natural, something he does not have to see at all, since he does not go to the neighborhoods where they are, and they do not come to the neighborhood where he sits; they under-took a hunger march on Washington, to be sure, to the White House or to the Capitol, but they are dispersed somewhere by the police before they can do it with rubber truncheons and tear gas, and so on, all of them things which do not exist in autocratic Germany. We have not used these measures against our people at all, we manage without rubber truncheons and without these things, without tear gas. We are resolute in our renunciation of them, while in the case of the enemy it is understood that at the moment of taking power they increased it... You know them already from my fighting period. I travel with three countries, their... Every attempt to come to an understanding with England was altogether to no purpose. Here there were people...

They saw in Germany an enemy, and that the world had changed essentially since the time of their great Queen Victoria, that people did not know at all that Germany never threatened England but that this England could be maintained only when she had found a close cooperation with Europe. This they did not realize. On the contrary, they fought on every occasion against Europe. It is quite interesting as they themselves, when a man, who is really a man, arrives, he is thrown out immediately? These are unbreakable eggs. Wherever they step they remain somewhere again, among enemies. On the whole they have been in the cold too long. They have already spoken of the breaking up of the German Reich by next September, and with the help of this advance prophesy, and we say that the war will not end as the Jews imagine it will, namely, with the uprooting of the Aryans, but the result of this war will be the complete annihilation of the Jews. And the further this war spreads, the farther will spread this fight against the world of the... I was more fortunate with the second state, with which I found some relationship.

That is actually no wonder. However, it would be a real wonder, if it were otherwise. Because, already-as I said today in a... A hundred years ago, Germany fought its way to a renaissance as a state, and its independence as a state, and Italy was fighting for its national united... Then these two states separated, and both nations fought without success and then came the... Both Revolutions had about the same course; each one had severe setbacks, but finally won the fight. Both nations brought about... Both nations concerned people who could not find their daily bread on their own soil. Both nations found themselves one day standing opposite the same people, without wanting to, against the same international union, as already had occurred in 1935, when England suddenly turned against Italy, without any sort of preliminary warning; Italy had taken nothing from England, therefore it was for the reason that: "We do not wish Italy to have its free right to life," just as it was, with Germany, for the reason that: "We do not wish Germany to have its free right to life. What do we want from England?

I offered each of them peace, more, I want to offer friendship. On the other side an old freemason, who only believes in a war, to be able to salvage his bankrupt economy, perhaps, or at least to gain time. Thus both states again stand face to face with the same foe... And then, in addition, there is still a third thing-I have mentioned it today also: in both cases they are men, two men, who have come from the people... In the last few weeks... I have read about the history of the Italian Fascist Revolution, and it seemed to me as if I had the history of my own party before me, so similar, so identical, that... And now finally the third state has joined us, another state with which we have always wanted to have good relations for the past many years. You all know it from "Mein Kampf"-Japan. Now the three great Have-Nots are united, and now we shall see who... For, what does England want to gain?

What does America want to gain? What do they want to gain? They have so much that they do not know what to do with what they have. A few persons per square kilometer need much more for all the cares which we are not the ones to have. A single poor harvest means for our national decades plundered, exploited, crushed, and in spite of that they could not eliminate their own economic need. They have raw materials, as much as they are willing to use, and they do not complete it, with their problems actually to found something reasonable in society, to the one who has everything and the one who wants to take from the other fellow who has hardly anything practically the last thing he owns, or to the one who defends that which he honors as his last possession. Pray to God that he must send Bolshevism over Europe as a scourge. We wish only to say, "It will not come over Germany but whether it will come over England is another story. We have never done anything to England, France, we have never done anything to America. Nevertheless there follows now in the year 1939 the declaration of war, and now it has gone further.

Now you must however out of my whole history understand me rightly. One sentence unintelligible. I said: "If the war is inevitable, then I should rather be the one to conduct it not because I thirst after this fame; on the contrary, I here gladly renounce that fame, which is in my eyes no fame at all. My fame, if Providence preserves my life, will consist in... But I think that if Providence has already disposed that I can do what must be done according to the inscrutable will of the Providence, then I can at least just ask Providence to entrust to me the burden of this war, to load it on me. I will beat it!

В Лондоне решили направить послом в Москву мистера Криппса. Он получил четкое задание при любых обстоятельствах восстановить отношения между Англией и Советской Россией и развивать их в английских интересах. О прогрессе этой миссии сообщала английская пресса, если тактические соображения не вынуждали ее к молчанию. Осенью 1939 года и весной 1940 года первые последствия стали свершившимися фактами. Приступив к подчинению военной силой не только Финляндии, но и прибалтийских государств, Россия внезапно стала мотивировать эти действия столь же лживыми, как и смехотворным утверждением, будто эти страны нужно защищать от угрозы извне или предупредить ее. Но при этом могла иметься в виду только Германия, так как ни одна другая держава вообще не могла ни проникнуть в зону Балтийского моря, ни вести там войну. Несмотря на это, я опять смолчал. Но правители в Кремле сразу же пошли дальше. В то время, как Германия войной 1940 года в соответствии с т. Согласно одному заявлению, сделанному тогда лично Молотовым, уже весной 1940 года только в прибалтийских государствах находились 22 русские дивизии. Так как русское правительство само постоянно утверждало, что их призвало местное население, целью их дальнейшего пребывания там могла быть только демонстрация против Германии. В то время, как наши солдаты 10 мая 1940 года сломили франко-британскую силу на Западе, сосредоточение русских войск на нашем восточном фронте постепенно принимало все более угрожающие размеры. Поэтому с августа 1940 года я пришел к выводу, что интересы Рейха будут нарушены роковым образом, если перед лицом этого мощного сосредоточения большевистских дивизий мы оставим незащищенными наши восточные провинции, которые и так уже не раз опустошались. Произошло то, на что было направлено англо-советское сотрудничество, а именно: на Востоке были связаны столь большие немецкие силы, что руководство Германии не могло больше рассчитывать на радикальное окончание войны на Западе, особенно в результате действий авиации. Это соответствовало цели не только британской, но и советской политики, ибо как Англия, так и Советская Россия хотели, чтобы эта война длилась как можно дольше, чтобы ослабить всю Европу и максимально обессилить ее. Угрожающее наступление России также в конечном счете служило только одной задаче: взять в свои руки важную основу экономической жизни не только Германии, но и всей Европы или, в зависимости от обстоятельств, как минимум уничтожить её. Но именно Германский Рейх с 1933 года с бесконечным терпением старался сделать государства Юго-Восточной Европы своими торговыми партнерами. Поэтому мы были больше всех заинтересованы в их внутренней государственной консолидации и сохранении в них порядка. Вторжение России в Румынию и союз Греции с Англией угрожали вскоре превратить и эти территории в арену всеобщей войны. Вопреки нашим принципам и обычаям я в ответ на настоятельную просьбу тогдашнего румынского правительства, которое само было повинно в таком развитии событий, дал совет ради мира уступить советскому шантажу и отдать Бессарабию. Но румынское правительство считало, что сможет оправдать этот шаг перед своим народом лишь при том условий, если Германия и Италия в порядке возмещения ущерба, дадут как минимум гарантию нерушимости границ оставшейся части Румынии. Я сделал это с тяжелым сердцем. Причина понятна: если Германский Рейх дает гарантию, это означает, что он за нее ручается. Мы не англичане и не евреи. Я верил до последнего часа, что послужу делу мира в этом регионе, даже если приму на себя тяжелые обязательства. Но чтобы окончательно решить эти проблемы и уяснить русскую позицию по отношению к Рейху, испытывая давление постоянно усиливающейся мобилизации на наших восточных границах, я пригласил господина Молотова в Берлин. Советский министр иностранных дел потребовал прояснения позиции или согласия Германии по следующим 4 вопросам: 1-й вопрос Молотова: Будет ли германская гарантия Румынии в случае нападения Советской России на Румынию направлена также против Советской России? Германская гарантия имеет общий и обязательный для нас характер. Россия никогда не заявляла нам, что, кроме Бессарабии, у нее вообще есть в Румынии еще какие-то интересы. Оккупация Северной Буковины уже была нарушением этого заверения. Поэтому я не думаю, что Россия теперь вдруг вознамерилась предпринять какие-то дальнейшие действия против Румынии. Готова ли Германия не оказывать Финляндии поддержки и, прежде всего, немедленно отвести назад немецкие войска, которые продвигаются к Киркенесу на смену прежним? Германия по-прежнему не имеет в Финляндии никаких политических интересов, однако правительство Германского рейха не могло бы терпимо отнестись к новой войне России против маленького финского народа, тем более мы никогда не могли поверить в угрозу России со стороны Финляндии. Мы вообще не хотели бы, чтобы Балтийское море опять стало театром военных действий. Болгария — суверенное государство, и мне неизвестно, обращалась ли вообще Болгария к Советской России с просьбой о гарантии подобно тому, как Румыния обратилась к Германии. Кроме того, я должен обсудить этот вопрос с моими союзниками. Согласится с этим Германия или нет? Германия готова в любой момент дать свое согласие на изменение статуса проливов, определенного соглашением в Монтрё в пользу черноморских государств, но Германия не готова согласиться на создание русских военных баз в проливах. Я занял в данном вопросе позицию, которую только и мог занять как ответственный вождь Германского рейха и как сознающий свою ответственность представитель европейской культуры и цивилизации. Результатом стало усиление советской деятельности, направленной против Рейха, прежде всего, немедленно был начат подкоп под новое румынское государство, усилились и попытки с помощью пропаганды свергнуть болгарское правительство. С помощью запутавшихся, незрелых людей из румынского Легиона удалось инсценировать государственный переворот, целью которого было свергнуть главу государства генерала Антонеску, ввергнуть страну в хаос и, устранив законную власть, создать предпосылки для того, чтобы обещанные Германией гарантии не могли вступить в силу. Несмотря на это, я продолжал считать, что лучше всего хранить молчание. Сразу же после краха этой авантюры опять усилилась концентрация русских войск на восточной границе Германии. Танковые и парашютные войска во все большем количестве перебрасывались на угрожающе близкое к германской границе расстояние. Германский Вермахт и германская родина знают, что еще несколько недель назад на нашей восточной границе не было ни одной немецкой танковой или моторизованной дивизии. Но если требовалось последнее доказательство того, что, несмотря на все опровержения и маскировку, возникла коалиция между Англией и Советской Россией, то его дал югославский конфликт. Пока я предпринимал последнюю попытку умиротворения Балкан и, разумеется, вместе с дуче предложил Югославии присоединиться к Тройственному пакту, Англия и Советская Россия совместно организовали путч, и за одну ночь устранили тогдашнее правительство, готовое к взаимопониманию. Сегодня об этом можно рассказать немецкому народу: антигерманский государственный переворот в Сербии произошел не только под английскими, но и, прежде всего, под советскими знаменами. Поскольку мы промолчали и об этом, советское руководство сделало следующий шаг. Оно не только организовало путч, но и несколько дней спустя заключило со своими новыми ставленниками известный договор о дружбе, призванный укрепить волю Сербии оказать сопротивление умиротворению на Балканах и натравить ее на Германию. И это не было платоническим намерением.

In general, everything in Germany seemed now to be dead. But I took that over. It was no bright heritage, but I looked upon it as an honor to take over something not at the moment when it is flourishing, but to take it over at the moment when others say: "Everything is already ruined. Everyone can, of course? It was altogether clear to me that? I would have been beaten to death, I dared and I won. I began to stabilize the German currency by relentless pressure from above. I began, however, to stabilize it so... German production... All that is easy to tell today, but it was not so easy then, for if it had been so easy, why did my opponents not do it? I immediately began with the repression of all the foreign elements in Germany; I mean our cosmopolites. I began also at this time to bring individual provinces into the Reich. Instead of numberless economic organizations a combination of all in one single bureau. At first, of course, everyone complained whose interests were thereby threatened. But one thing no one can dispute, from either the right or left: In the end everything went better than before. For one thing, my comrades, you must all admit, wherever you come from: Everywhere today you see works of peace which we could no longer continue on account of war. Everywhere you see great buildings, schools, housing projects, which the war has kept us from carrying on. Before I entered upon this war, I had begun a gigantic program of social, economic, cultural work, in part already completed. But everywhere I had in mind new plans, new projects. When, on the other hand, I look at my opponents, what have they really done, now? They could rush easily enough into war. War did not rob them of a peaceful state, for they have accomplished nothing. This prattler, this drink-bold Churchill, what has he in reality accomplished in his life? This perfidious fellow is a lazybones of the first order. If this war had not come, the centuries would have spoken of our generation and also of all of us and also of myself as the creator of great works of peace. But if this war had not come, who would speak of Churchill? Now he will one day be spoken of, to be sure, but as the destroyer of an empire, which he and now we destroyed. One of the most pitiful phrase-mongering natures of world history, incapable of creating anything, of accomplishing anything, or of performing creative acts, capable only of destroying. Of his accomplice in the White House I would rather not speak at all, moreover-a wretched madman. To be sure, the more we worked, the more we put Germany in order, the greater grew the hatred, unfortunately. For now there came something in addition. Now came the stupid hatred of the social strata abroad, who believed that the German model, the socialistic German model, could break in on them also, circumstances permitting. I have often heard that those in other countries said themselves: "Well, you know,... I do not even demand at all that they should be carried out. On the contrary, I am not here to concern myself with the happiness of other peoples, but I feel myself responsible exclusively for my own people. That is what I work for. To my sleepless nights I will not add a single one for other lands. Why not? That only spoils our working class. They do not perceive that the German workingman has worked more than ever before; why should he not then recover? Is it not above all a joke when that man from the White House says: "We have a World Program and this World Program will give mankind freedom and the right to labor. Roosevelt, open your eyes, we have had that in Germany for a long time already. Or when he says that care will be taken of illness. Go and look at the battle-cry of our party program that is National Socialistic, not its doctrine, my dear sir, those are high ideas like those of a Democrat. Or when he says: "We wish to raise the standard of prosperity, even for the masses. Those are prominent things in our program. For we have also done that without a war. You have a war! No, this capitalistic babble does not even think of doing such a thing. They see in us only the bad example, and in order to tempt their own people, they must meddle in our party program and there snatch out single sentences, these pitiful blunders, and even then they do it badly. We have had a united world against us here, naturally, not only from the right but also from the left, as those on the left say to us, "If that succeeds; this experiment, it actually creates, it brings it about, that it does away with homelessness. It makes it ready and establishes a school system whereby every talented youngster, irrespective of what kind of position. He completes it and makes a lawyer out of a former farm worker. He completed it. Why, we live by the fact that that does not exist. We do live by that. War, then, against this National Socialism. We have now been at the helm for nine years. This struggle will render the verdict, if this Russia is compared with Germany. What have we created in nine years, what is the aspect of the German people, and what has been created there? I do not even want to talk about the capitalist states, they are not at all concerned about their unemployed for that reason? To the American millionaire the unemployed person is something natural, something he does not have to see at all, since he does not go to the neighborhoods where they are, and they do not come to the neighborhood where he sits; they under-took a hunger march on Washington, to be sure, to the White House or to the Capitol, but they are dispersed somewhere by the police before they can do it with rubber truncheons and tear gas, and so on, all of them things which do not exist in autocratic Germany. We have not used these measures against our people at all, we manage without rubber truncheons and without these things, without tear gas. We are resolute in our renunciation of them, while in the case of the enemy it is understood that at the moment of taking power they increased it... You know them already from my fighting period. I travel with three countries, their... Every attempt to come to an understanding with England was altogether to no purpose. Here there were people... They saw in Germany an enemy, and that the world had changed essentially since the time of their great Queen Victoria, that people did not know at all that Germany never threatened England but that this England could be maintained only when she had found a close cooperation with Europe. This they did not realize. On the contrary, they fought on every occasion against Europe. It is quite interesting as they themselves, when a man, who is really a man, arrives, he is thrown out immediately? These are unbreakable eggs. Wherever they step they remain somewhere again, among enemies. On the whole they have been in the cold too long. They have already spoken of the breaking up of the German Reich by next September, and with the help of this advance prophesy, and we say that the war will not end as the Jews imagine it will, namely, with the uprooting of the Aryans, but the result of this war will be the complete annihilation of the Jews. And the further this war spreads, the farther will spread this fight against the world of the... I was more fortunate with the second state, with which I found some relationship. That is actually no wonder. However, it would be a real wonder, if it were otherwise. Because, already-as I said today in a... A hundred years ago, Germany fought its way to a renaissance as a state, and its independence as a state, and Italy was fighting for its national united... Then these two states separated, and both nations fought without success and then came the... Both Revolutions had about the same course; each one had severe setbacks, but finally won the fight. Both nations brought about... Both nations concerned people who could not find their daily bread on their own soil. Both nations found themselves one day standing opposite the same people, without wanting to, against the same international union, as already had occurred in 1935, when England suddenly turned against Italy, without any sort of preliminary warning; Italy had taken nothing from England, therefore it was for the reason that: "We do not wish Italy to have its free right to life," just as it was, with Germany, for the reason that: "We do not wish Germany to have its free right to life. What do we want from England? I offered each of them peace, more, I want to offer friendship. On the other side an old freemason, who only believes in a war, to be able to salvage his bankrupt economy, perhaps, or at least to gain time. Thus both states again stand face to face with the same foe... And then, in addition, there is still a third thing-I have mentioned it today also: in both cases they are men, two men, who have come from the people... In the last few weeks... I have read about the history of the Italian Fascist Revolution, and it seemed to me as if I had the history of my own party before me, so similar, so identical, that... And now finally the third state has joined us, another state with which we have always wanted to have good relations for the past many years. You all know it from "Mein Kampf"-Japan. Now the three great Have-Nots are united, and now we shall see who... For, what does England want to gain? What does America want to gain? What do they want to gain? They have so much that they do not know what to do with what they have. A few persons per square kilometer need much more for all the cares which we are not the ones to have. A single poor harvest means for our national decades plundered, exploited, crushed, and in spite of that they could not eliminate their own economic need. They have raw materials, as much as they are willing to use, and they do not complete it, with their problems actually to found something reasonable in society, to the one who has everything and the one who wants to take from the other fellow who has hardly anything practically the last thing he owns, or to the one who defends that which he honors as his last possession. Pray to God that he must send Bolshevism over Europe as a scourge. We wish only to say, "It will not come over Germany but whether it will come over England is another story. We have never done anything to England, France, we have never done anything to America. Nevertheless there follows now in the year 1939 the declaration of war, and now it has gone further. Now you must however out of my whole history understand me rightly. One sentence unintelligible. I said: "If the war is inevitable, then I should rather be the one to conduct it not because I thirst after this fame; on the contrary, I here gladly renounce that fame, which is in my eyes no fame at all. My fame, if Providence preserves my life, will consist in... But I think that if Providence has already disposed that I can do what must be done according to the inscrutable will of the Providence, then I can at least just ask Providence to entrust to me the burden of this war, to load it on me. I will beat it! I will shrink from no responsibility; in every hour which... I will take this burden upon me. I will bear every responsibility, just as I have always borne them. It knows that I had endless plans in those years before the war. It sees everywhere the signs of works begun, and sometimes also the documents of completion. I know that this people trusts me. I am happy to know it. But the German people may be persuaded also of one thing, that the year 1918, as long as I live, will never return. I am glad that so many allies have joined our soldiers: in Sweden, Italy, then in the north, Finland and the many other nations which are sending their sons here to the east, too,... Rumanians and Hungarians, Slovaks, Spaniards,...

Adolph Hitler SPEECH OF OCTOBER 6, 1939

Речь гитлера на немецком языке текст - Научные работы на	Adolf Hitler said in a speech: Wenn es dem internationalen Finanzjudentum in und außerhalb Europas gelingen sollte, die Völker noch einmal in einen Weltkrieg zu stürzen, dann wird das Ergebnis nicht der Sieg des Judentums sein, sondern die Vernichtung der jüdischen Rasse in Europa! If international.
Полный текст заявления Гитлера от 22 июня 1941 года: glavbuhdudin — LiveJournal	Гитлер выступает во время выступления 30 января 1939 года немецкий диктатор Адольф Гитлер произнес речь в Рейхстаге, которая наиболее известна своим предсказанием о.
Adolf Hitler: Rede vor dem Reichstag am 1. September 1939	причем в оригинале, русский перевод с купюрами я уже.

Речь гитлера на немецком языке текст

"Why We Are Antisemites" - Text of Adolf Hitler's 1920 speech at the Hofbräuhaus	My German Fellow Countrymen and Women, My Comrades! At present everybody speaks before the forum which seems to them the most fitting. Some speak before a parliament whose existence, composition and origin (are well known). I believe that I should return again today whence I came.
Знаменитый фрагмент из фильма “Der Untergang” (рус. “Бункер”) — Речь Гитлера в бункере	Reichstag Speech, May 21, 1935. "We recognize, with the understanding and the heartfelt friendship of true Nationalists, the Polish State as the home of a great, nationally-conscious people." "The German Reich and, in particular, the present German Government, have no other wish than to live on friendly.
Речь гитлера на немецком текст	The speeches, letters, and proclamations of Adolph Hitler.
1 September 1939 Reichstag speech - Wikipedia	On September 12, 1938, Adolf Hitler, Chancellor of the Reich, addressed the German Reichstag. That morning, The German Reich had crossed the German-Czech frontier, thus initiating the Invasion of Czechoslovakia. Delegates, Men of the German Reichstag! For months we have been suffering under.
Telegram: Contact @ntsp2	30 января 1945 г.

Adolph Hitler SPEECH OF OCTOBER 6, 1939

We have, therefore, resolved to conclude a pact which rules out for ever any use of violence between us... Russia and Germany fought against one another in the World War. That shall and will not happen a second time. Hitler justified the German attack by claiming Polish culpability based on invented Polish atrocities at Pitschen and other places, including Gleiwitz and Hochlinden , [3] both of these being part of the culmination of Operation Himmler , a false flag operation intended to demonstrate that the Poles had attacked first, the Gleiwitz incident being the most noted. This night for the first time Polish regular soldiers fired on our territory. Since 5:45 a.

Hitler then declared himself as the "First soldier of the German Reich" Erster Soldat des Deutschen Reiches , a self-claimed rank, effectively equivalent of Generalissimo. I have once more put on that coat that was the most sacred and dear to me. I will not take it off again until victory is secured, or I will not survive the outcome.

Their Germany, their democratic Germany. The child which they had... This freak of parliamentary democracy, constitution of Weimar and body of laws from Versailles!

How they mishandled this monster-child, oppressed it, wrung it out. If today they act as though they are against us National Socialists, or turn against National Socialist Germany, still, did they not... Only there is one difference: they cannot... To us it makes no difference what their opinion of us is: I have never, even to the slightest degree, counted on having foreign countries... If it should come to pass that my enemies should praise me, then the German nation can send me to the devil. They were refused every human right, but they should have had the right, now and then, to participate in an international conference, or even to preside there.

The disarmament: If today it is said, that our Germany, this National Socialist Germany, forced us to arm, putting aside the fact that... There was once a Germany which had no arms at all. They could have done it, or does anyone believe that perhaps Stresemann or Marx, or any one of these men, Wirth, Bauer, Eberth, Scheidemann, would have declared the might of war? Well, that cannot be told anyone. That is when they should have disarmed. Some of them got themselves well-fixed in one place, some in another.

They knew very well why Germany had to be disarmed. They added all of this to the name Democracy. And then the terrible unemployment. Where was all the economic...? Where were the wonder-workers magicians? If today they can lie so in the newspapers, so that President Roosevelt declares that America will give the world a new economic order.

It may very well be a new order, but a very miserable one. Such is the system, a system with which he has himself gone bankrupt, so that he now believes that only through a war can he preserve the justice of nations. Politico-economically, the German people has not received what was promised it before the days of the Versailles Treaty. On the contrary, as the other world went to pieces progressively, unemployment grew and continued to grow greater. The years 1913 to 1930 are years of continuous experimentation, continuous economic ruin, an uninterrupted prostitution of the political sovereignty of the German people; also an abandonment of economic materials. And we had to witness all this.

At that time I fought, but during those years, my countrymen, there were many setbacks for forbidden parties, one sentence... Then again local groups were dissolved, then again, over all of German states the movement was forbidden. In short, there was a continuous fight against uninterrupted setbacks. Then, finally, came September, 1930, and we walked into the Reichstag with our 106 mandates-another was added-107 mandates. Then we should have been given part in the government, but that was when the real opposition sidetracking came, and it grew greater uninterruptedly. It was a continuous battle, which eventually...

How many party members did we lose at the time? Then came the year 1932. The first presidential election, again a setback. The second presidential election, the party saw... It was a fight in which all was at stake. Many persons again had to pay with their lives that year.

Many persons went to prison. And then came July, with a... Then everyone cried: "This is the hour in which to take over power," and again the hour passed by, it had to go by. And then came another reversal. And then-a final battle. And finally the day, the memory of which we are celebrating.

Now, my compatriots countrymen , I have related this to you only very briefly, in order to show you above all else that: the victory which we are celebrating today, did not come to us at that time as an easy gift, which fell into our laps. This victory was bound up with great efforts, with sacrifices, with deprivations, with unceasing labors, and also with setbacks. And if you had asked anyone on January 15, "Do you believe that this person"-that was I at that time-"will get into power? And now I must mention something else. I told you what I found conditions to be in the year 1919 to 1920, when I brought the party into existence; I have depicted for you the situation, after my first great defeat. But I must recall to your memory, in just a few sentences, what I had taken upon myself on that 30th of January.

It was a heritage which hardly anyone wanted any more to take over at all. Everything ruined, the economy destroyed; 7,000,000 people without a living, and it was increasing from week to week; 7,000,000 part-time workers. The Reich finances an enormous deficit of nearly three billions. The peasantry on the verge of complete collapse, on the verge of having land and soil auctioned off. Trade crippled, commerce brought to a halt, our shipping no longer in existence. In general, everything in Germany seemed now to be dead.

But I took that over. It was no bright heritage, but I looked upon it as an honor to take over something not at the moment when it is flourishing, but to take it over at the moment when others say: "Everything is already ruined. Everyone can, of course? It was altogether clear to me that? I would have been beaten to death, I dared and I won. I began to stabilize the German currency by relentless pressure from above.

I began, however, to stabilize it so... German production... All that is easy to tell today, but it was not so easy then, for if it had been so easy, why did my opponents not do it? I immediately began with the repression of all the foreign elements in Germany; I mean our cosmopolites. I began also at this time to bring individual provinces into the Reich. Instead of numberless economic organizations a combination of all in one single bureau.

At first, of course, everyone complained whose interests were thereby threatened. But one thing no one can dispute, from either the right or left: In the end everything went better than before. For one thing, my comrades, you must all admit, wherever you come from: Everywhere today you see works of peace which we could no longer continue on account of war. Everywhere you see great buildings, schools, housing projects, which the war has kept us from carrying on. Before I entered upon this war, I had begun a gigantic program of social, economic, cultural work, in part already completed. But everywhere I had in mind new plans, new projects.

When, on the other hand, I look at my opponents, what have they really done, now? They could rush easily enough into war. War did not rob them of a peaceful state, for they have accomplished nothing. This prattler, this drink-bold Churchill, what has he in reality accomplished in his life? This perfidious fellow is a lazybones of the first order. If this war had not come, the centuries would have spoken of our generation and also of all of us and also of myself as the creator of great works of peace.

But if this war had not come, who would speak of Churchill? Now he will one day be spoken of, to be sure, but as the destroyer of an empire, which he and now we destroyed. One of the most pitiful phrase-mongering natures of world history, incapable of creating anything, of accomplishing anything, or of performing creative acts, capable only of destroying. Of his accomplice in the White House I would rather not speak at all, moreover-a wretched madman. To be sure, the more we worked, the more we put Germany in order, the greater grew the hatred, unfortunately. For now there came something in addition.

Now came the stupid hatred of the social strata abroad, who believed that the German model, the socialistic German model, could break in on them also, circumstances permitting. I have often heard that those in other countries said themselves: "Well, you know,... I do not even demand at all that they should be carried out. On the contrary, I am not here to concern myself with the happiness of other peoples, but I feel myself responsible exclusively for my own people. That is what I work for. To my sleepless nights I will not add a single one for other lands.

Why not? That only spoils our working class. They do not perceive that the German workingman has worked more than ever before; why should he not then recover? Is it not above all a joke when that man from the White House says: "We have a World Program and this World Program will give mankind freedom and the right to labor. Roosevelt, open your eyes, we have had that in Germany for a long time already. Or when he says that care will be taken of illness.

Go and look at the battle-cry of our party program that is National Socialistic, not its doctrine, my dear sir, those are high ideas like those of a Democrat. Or when he says: "We wish to raise the standard of prosperity, even for the masses. Those are prominent things in our program. For we have also done that without a war. You have a war! No, this capitalistic babble does not even think of doing such a thing.

They see in us only the bad example, and in order to tempt their own people, they must meddle in our party program and there snatch out single sentences, these pitiful blunders, and even then they do it badly. We have had a united world against us here, naturally, not only from the right but also from the left, as those on the left say to us, "If that succeeds; this experiment, it actually creates, it brings it about, that it does away with homelessness. It makes it ready and establishes a school system whereby every talented youngster, irrespective of what kind of position. He completes it and makes a lawyer out of a former farm worker. He completed it. Why, we live by the fact that that does not exist.

We do live by that. War, then, against this National Socialism. We have now been at the helm for nine years. This struggle will render the verdict, if this Russia is compared with Germany. What have we created in nine years, what is the aspect of the German people, and what has been created there? I do not even want to talk about the capitalist states, they are not at all concerned about their unemployed for that reason?

To the American millionaire the unemployed person is something natural, something he does not have to see at all, since he does not go to the neighborhoods where they are, and they do not come to the neighborhood where he sits; they under-took a hunger march on Washington, to be sure, to the White House or to the Capitol, but they are dispersed somewhere by the police before they can do it with rubber truncheons and tear gas, and so on, all of them things which do not exist in autocratic Germany. We have not used these measures against our people at all, we manage without rubber truncheons and without these things, without tear gas. We are resolute in our renunciation of them, while in the case of the enemy it is understood that at the moment of taking power they increased it... You know them already from my fighting period. I travel with three countries, their... Every attempt to come to an understanding with England was altogether to no purpose.

Here there were people...

Осенью 1939 г. Приступая к военному порабощению не только Финляндии, но также и балтийских государств, Россия вдруг мотивировала эти действия в такой же мере ложным, как и смешным заявлением, что она принуждена защищать эти страны от чужой угрозы, которую она должна предупредить. Под этим могла подразумеваться только Германия. Ибо никакая другая держава не могла ни вторгнуться, ни вести войну в прибалтийских областях. И все же я должен был молчать. Однако власть имущие в Кремле сейчас же пошли дальше. В то время, как Германия весной 1940 г.

Согласно личному заявлению, данному тогда Молотовым, уже весной 1940 г. Так как русское правительство всегда утверждало, что его пригласило само население, цель его присутствия там могла быть истолкована только как демонстрация против Германии. В то время, как наши солдаты, начиная с 10 мая 1940 г. Начиная с августа 1940 г. Однако было достигнуто то, к чему стремилось англосоветское сотрудничество, а именно: ввиду концентрации такого количества германских сил на Востоке, германские власть имущие не сочли возможным предпринять радикальное завершение войны на западе, особенно в отношении воздушной борьбы. Это соответствовало, однако, целям не только английской, но также и советской политики. Потому что Англия, равно как и Советская Россия, намерены продлить эту войну как можно дольше, с целью ослабить Европу и повергнуть ее в еще большее бессилие. Угрожающее выступление России против Румынии должно было также в конечном итоге послужить лишь тому, чтобы захватить в свои руки или же, по крайней мере, уничтожить важную опору не только германской экономической жизни, но и экономической жизни всей Европы.

Однако, именно Германия, начиная с 1933 г. Мы были поэтому в высшей степени заинтересованы в их государственной консолидации и порядке. В немецком оригинале «в непосредственной близости с мощным выдвижением большевистских дивизий» «gewaltigen Kraeftaufmarsh bolschewistischer Divisionen» S, 9. В немецком оригинале «сделать их своими торговыми партнёрами» — «als Handelspartner zu gewinnen» S. Вторжение России в Румынию и переход Греции на сторону Англии грозили в короткое время превратить также и эти области в общий театр войны. Вопреки нашим принципам и обычаям, уступая настойчивой просьбе тогдашнего румынского правительства, которое было само виновато в таком развитии событий, я дал ему совет уступить настойчивым советским требованиям и отдать Бессарабию в целях сохранения мира. Однако румынское правительство считало возможным обнаружить это перед своим народом лишь в том случае, если Германия и Италия, в виде возмещения, по крайней мере дадут гарантию, что оставшаяся часть румынского государства более не будет затронута. С тяжелым сердцем я сделал это.

Прежде всего, уже потому, что если Германия дает гарантию, то это значит, что она отвечает за нее. Мы не англичане и не евреи. Таким образом, я думал в последний момент сохранить мир в этой области, даже несмотря на принятие на себя тяжелых обязательств. Однако с целью окончательно разрешить эти проблемы и установить ясность в вопросе русского отношения к Германии1, а также под давлением постоянно усиливающейся мобилизации на нашей восточной границе, я пригласил г. Молотова приехать в Берлин. Советский министр иностранных дел потребовал разрешения2 или же согласия Германии по следующим четырем вопросам; 1 Так в документе. В немецком оригинале «русской позиции в отношении Рейха» — «russische Einstellung dem Reiche» S. В немецком оригинале «уяснения» -«Klaerung» S.

Мой ответ: Германская гарантия является общей и непременно обязывающей нас. Однако Россия нам никогда не заявляла, что она имеет интересы в Румынии, за исключением Бессарабии. Уже занятие Северной Буковины явилось нарушением этого заверения. Поэтому я не думал, что Россия теперь вдруг может иметь какие-либо дальнейшие намерения против Румынии. Россия решила долее не терпеть этого. Готова ли Германия не оказывать Финляндии никакого содействия и, прежде всего, сейчас же отозвать германские войска, направляющиеся на смену в Киркенес? Мой ответ: Германия, теперь, как и прежде, не имеет политических интересов в Финляндии. Однако германское правительство не может потерпеть новой войны России против маленького финского народа, тем более, что мы никогда не сможем поверить в угрозу Финляндии для Советской России.

Мы вообще не желаем, чтобы в Балтийском море вновь возник театр военных действий.

Just as no one can deny the reverse, that we were entirely innocent in starting that war. We were all only very ordinary soldiers, just as you are now, my dear wounded men sitting here before me. Unknown and nameless men, whom duty had simply called, nothing else, and who in response had fulfilled their duty as faithfully as they were able. The same motive forces which were to blame for the first world war are now responsible for the second static. Germany then was a monarchy; in other words not a National-Socialist dictatorship. The Germany of that period was democratic, that is, not a national-socialistic state, and the Germany of that period was parliamentarian, that is, not what Germany is today, to say nothing of all other differences. There had to be reasons therefore, which led to the attack of these powers then as today, and which had nothing to do with the respective forms of government, although both sides pretend that it is just this which called them into the field of battle.

They did not enter the war for this reason. They did not enter and are not at war because they were irritated by the form of the state. They are capable of embracing the vilest type of government when necessary and of fraternizing with it. No, no, it is not a question of a form of a government, but other reasons which brought them previously into a war against the German state. At that time England was the principal initiator of this struggle, England, which during 300 years... Static-part of the sentence unintelligible. People once subjugated to be kept in subjugation. By force they made one state after another pay them tribute and become their servants.

In this manner England has subjugated the world over a period of a few hundred years; and, to make secure this conquest of the world, this subjugation of people, England endeavors to maintain the so-called balance of power in Europe. This means in reality that it endeavors to make sure that no European state is able to win over a certain measure... What they wanted was a disunited, disintegrated Europe, a Europe all of whose forces completely offset one another. To reach this goal, England conducted one war after another in Europe. She has seen first its powerful position menaced by Spain. When they had finally conquered Spain, they turned their attentions to the Netherlanders. When Holland seemed to represent no further danger, British hate concentrated itself against France. And when finally France was crushed with the help of all Europe, to be sure, they then imagined that Germany must be, of necessity, the one factor which might possibly be suited to the unification of Europe.

Then it was that the struggle against Germany began, not out of love for the nations, but only in their own most sober interests. It is well-known that they have always been the instigators of unrest among the nations, because they were able to profit only in time of unrest, and because a period of peace might lead to reflection and hence, also, to an insight into the ways of these evil-doers of all nations. When, in 1914,a world coalition against the German Reich of that time was first brewing,... They then said, "Germany must first of all be freed from its Kaiser. But the English always feel concerned for other nations, and for that reason they wanted to free Germany of its Kaiser, then as now. Finally, they said, "There shall be no more war. Therefore let us wage war upon war. If only one wanted to apply it in retrospect.

That means, if one wanted to say, "We agree that war is an injustice because only brutal force decides war. We will eliminate all coercion. Hence we will abolish everything arisen through coercion up to now. But still it would have been wonderful if England had led the way to the rest of the world in its abhorrence of war in this manner, that it would have liberated the fruits of its own wars, that is, that it would have placed them again at the disposition of the rest of the world. If England had done that, if it had therefore declared: "We abhor war. Therefore, we will immediately return South Africa; because we won it through war. We hate war. Therefore, we will return the East Indies; we also won those in a war.

For instance, we hate war. Therefore, we will also leave Egypt; because this also we have subjugated through force. We shall also retire from the entire Near East; because this also became ours through force. However, the struggle against war meant something entirely different in England; namely, this war against war was interpreted to mean every possibility of making good the injustices already existing in this world;... It is about the same as the attitude we recognize also in domestic policy, when people say: "We want no change in the social order. He who is rich is to stay rich; he who is poor must stay poor. As things are, so are they willed; and as they are willed, so they are to remain; for man should not rise against that which is once willed, because it is so. We see in each state and at each moment of this world the evidence of a never interrupted process of life; and it is impossible to say at a certain moment, "Here ceases this evolutionary process.

It lies, on the contrary, in the essence of Nature, that ever and again... That means therefore that from the domestic life of peoples the... And so the talk of war on war has been proved quite false. The best proof for that is that the moment the war was over, the conditions for a new war could by no means be avoided, nor the instruments for waging the new war, either. It would have been a wonderful gesture if after the disarmament of Germany, as it... We suggested it to them often, begged them to at the time of the Weimar Republic, and still later demanded that they do it. They considered it not at all. On the contrary, the wars went on.

Only the defeated people, the German people, lost every prospect ever in this world to change its condition once more for the better. The methods which they used in the first World War were like those with which they are fighting today. At first the war from outside, and war in the form of creating coalitions. Then he himself admits that they were never in a position to fight alone. But they guaranteed the Baltic states; they guaranteed the Balkans. They went on around: Every state in the world, they declared, needs a guarantee. Great Britain will put her whole strength behind them and will protect them. Today this same arch-liar says: "But we were really never in a position to carry on the war alone.

Therefore they cooked up a coalition against us of world-wide extent. The methods have likewise remained the same. Promises to all those of little faith, the credulous, or stupid, who wanted to trust these promises, moreover, the attempt to allow their own interests to be represented with as much other blood as possible. This truth is connected with the second British method, that is, with the method of division. In that time that the British Empire had its origin, Germany tore herself apart. There were at that time modes of thought that we no longer understand, modes of thought of a religious kind, that unfortunately were fought out only with the sword, modes of thought that became horrible among the people, that seem insufficient to us in their inner being. Only these grievous internal struggles, that cost the German people endless blood, gave England the opportunity in this same period, to raise up a world claim, that never belonged to her either in number or in significance. Then I must always point out that it is not true that we Germans are like upstarts, but if one wants to talk about upstarts, then it is unconditionally the English and not ourselves!

We have an older history, and in a time when Europe had a powerful German Empire, England was a quite insignificant, small, green island. In the last World War the possibilities of this splitting up lay in another sphere. Afterwards the religious problems did not provoke any more bloodshed, especially since the priests themselves would not have been ready any more to sacrifice their lives for these causes. We lived through it then. The parties of the right and the parties of the left, which further broke up in a dozen bourgeois aspects, in a half dozen proletarian aspects, and ever split up some more, and having begun with these parties, from the bourgeoisie of the bourgeois center up to the KPD Communist Party of Germany , succeeded this refers back to the parties of the right and left in undermining and breaking down the German people slowly from within. In spite of that, the course of the war was a glorious one. The years 1914-1918-they proved it: in which not even the opponents triumphed. A low, common revolt was plotted by Marxian-demoralizing-Liberal-Capitalistic subjects-behind all of it as a driving force was the eternal Jew.

They brought Germany to its collapse at that time. Only the cowardice of the then rulers, their indecision, their halfway measures, their own uncertainty brought it on. And so the First World War could not alone be lost by the merit of our opponents, but exclusively by our own fault. The consequences of this collapse in November were not that world democracy stretched out open arms to Germany, were not the concern of others to free the German people from its burdens and to lift the German people to a higher standard of culture. For that they could have no concern at all, for they themselves had a much lower one. But the consequence was just their collapse, the most frightful one, politically and economically, that a people has ever experienced. At that time there came to us a man who has done the German people immeasurable harm, Woodrow Wilson, the man who lied with a straight face. If Germany would lay down her arms, then she would get a compassionate, an understanding peace!

Then she would not lose her colonies! But the colonial problems were fixed up, all right! The man lyingly promised us that there would be a general disarmament, that we would then be accepted on equal terms among nations, peoples, etc. He lyingly promised us that then secret diplomacy would be done away with, and that we too would then enter into a new age of peace, of equality, of reason, etc.! Screams the last sentence. He was his right hand. Our German folk believed this man then. They had no idea that they were dealing here with an American President, that is, with a man who has no regard for truths; who, for example, can calmly say before an election: "I shall vote against war," and after the election can say: "I vote for war.

So there came the hour then the German people got its disappointment at the moment when the German subordinate emissaries entered the car in the Compiegne forest, now known to us for the second time. And there right away came the rude question: "What are you gentlemen doing here? They said: "He who says that the intention is to take from Germany her... They said beforehand: "He who says that we want to take away part of the German people is inciting the people! They had broken all their promises! In a few months the German people sank into a state of unimaginably deep despair and despondency-starving people without hope any longer. A people that did not get its war-prisoners back, even after the armistice and peace-treaty had been signed! A people that was not given food, even after it was defenseless!

A people that was now repeatedly coerced,-if one carefully studies those times-from whom re-subjection was again and again demanded, extorted by some new repression. When one reflects upon this even today, one falls even now into a state of burning hatred and rancor against a world in which anything like this is possible. Well, it was at that time, my racial comrades, when everything was broken up, when the upper leadership had faithlessly fled abroad, when others were surrendering, when the Wehrmacht had to give up its weapons, when the people disarmed themselves voluntarily,-it was at that time, when the agitation? It was such a mad determination in the eyes of those others, that my closest friends did not understand me. I found the strength for this determination only from my knowledge of the people. If, at that time, I had only known the upper ten thousand, believe me, my German people-I would not stand before you today, I would never have found courage for this thought which is capable of revolutionizing a people. I knew at that time first and all the people itself; I knew... I could not abandon that, for it would have been to betray my own comrades, who were just as badly...

I have come to know the great mass of the German people, ladies and gentlemen, from living with them. And these masses have not only upheld my belief in the people, but have restored it, and constantly strengthened it through all the years since then, in the face of contrary circumstances, or when any misfortune seemed to threaten the realization of my plans. It was clear to me that this whole development, just as in the last 20 years or 30 years before the war, could lead only to collapse. But I had already formed the resolve to declare war on this whole development. That is not merely to declare: "I will get a German Wehrmacht, I will get an army or an air-force"; it was clear to me that the inner structure of the social order must be altered, so that in the dead body of our people the blood would flow again, and that society should hold firmly... I have always looked upon this undertaking as possible, as within the power of the country. But I was of the conviction that strength could only be given to a body in which the sight and the essence of the new condition was already incorporated. Therefore, I was resolved to build up a small movement, beginning with those people who should already have within themselves that which appeared later as really essential to the whole of society.

And this was perhaps not so hard as I thought, inasmuch as I was already on guard against the danger of unworthy place-seekers or selfish persons joining my ranks. For whoever joined this movement in those years from 1919-23 had to be a boundless idealist. Any other kind of man would only say: "He is an utter fool. The man is mad. And I can say that of all my followers, all of them who at that time and later supported me: they had nothing to win, and everything to lose.

Речь Гитлера на съезде НСДАП 1934

Berlin, May 17, 1933. Deputies, Ladies and Gentlemen of the German Reichstag! In the name of the Reich Government I have asked the Reichstag President to convene the Reichstag so that I may take a stand before this forum on the questions which today affect not only our Volk but the entire world. Дюссельдорфская речь Первое выступление Гитлера 27 января 1932 на встрече с германскими промышленными магнатами в "Клубе индустрии", куда он был приглашен известным промышленником Фрицем Тиссеном. The speeches, letters, and proclamations of Adolph Hitler. Мартин Вютке Речь Гитлера из фильма. September 1, 1939, justifying the German invasion of Poland. Short video clip excerpt. Речь гитлера Речи гитлера на немецком с переводом.

Последняя речь Гитлера в бункере перед смертью. Почему её так долго скрывали от народа

But it is something most natural that compels us Germans to take an interest in this problem. Among the majority of nationalities that are being suppressed in this State there are 3,500,000 Germans. These Germans, too, are creatures of God. The Almighty did not create them that they should be surrendered by a State construction made at Versailles to a foreign power that is hateful to them, and He has not created 7,000,000 Czechs in order that they should supervise 3,500,000 Germans or act as guardians for them and still less to do them violence and torture. The conditions in this nation are unbearable, as is generally known. Politically more than 3,500,000 people were robbed in the name of the right of self-determination of a certain Mr. Wilson of their self-determination and of their right to self-determination. Economically these people were deliberately ruined and afterward handed over to a slow process of extermination. These truths cannot be abolished by phrases.

They are testified to by deeds. The misery of the Sudeten Germans is without end. They want to annihilate them. They are being oppressed in an inhuman and intolerable manner and treated in an undignified way. When 3,500,000 who belong to a people of almost 80,000,000 are not allowed to sing any song that the Czechs do not like because it does not please the Czechs or are brutally struck for wearing white stockings because the Czechs do not like it, and do not want to see them, and are terrorized or maltreated because they greet with a form of salutation that is not agreeable to them, although they are greeting not Czechs but one another, and when they are pursued like wild beasts for every expression of their national life. This may be a matter of indifference to several representatives of our democracies or they may possibly even be sympathetic because it concerns only 3,500,000 Germans. I can only say to representatives of the democracies that this is not a matter of indifference to us. And I say that if these tortured creatures cannot obtain rights and assistance by themselves, they can obtain both from us.

An end must be made of depriving these people of their rights. I have already said this quite clearly in my speech of February 22. It was a short-sighted piece of work when the statesmen at Versailles brought the abnormal structure of Czechoslovakia into being. It was possible to violate the demands of millions of another nationality only so long as the brother nation itself was suffering from the consequences of general maltreatment by the world. To believe that such a regime could go on sinning without hindrance forever was possible only through a scarcely credible degree of blindness. I declared in my speech of February 22 before the Reichstag that the Reich would not tolerate any further continued oppression of 3,500,000 Germans, and I hope that the foreign statesmen will be convinced that these were no mere words. The National Socialist State has consented to very great sacrifices indeed, very great national sacrifices for the sake of European peace; not only has it not cherished so-called thoughts of revenge, but on the contrary it has banished them from all its public and private life. As always, I attempted to bring about, by the peaceful method of making proposals for revision, an alteration of this intolerable position.

It is a lie when the outside world says that we only tried to carry through our revisions by pressure. For twenty years there was the opportunity for the Czechoslovak government of carrying out these revisions by peaceful settlements and understanding. All these proposals, as you know, have been rejected by the Czechs - proposals of giving the Sudeten German minority a humane treatment and the respect they deserve. You know the proposals that I have made to fulfill the necessity of restoring German sovereignty over German territories. You know the endless attempts I made for a peaceful clarification and understanding of the problem of Austria. It was all in vain.

Hear, hear His own temple has been built by foreign builders: The first was the Assyrians, and for the building of the second — the Roman artists. He has not left anything which might be called art, no buildings, nothing. We shall not conceal that today he has many famous conductors whose fame he can thank the well-organized Jewish Press for.

Laughter When a nation does not possess these three traits, it is not able to create states. And that is true because throughout centuries the Jew was always a nomad. He has never had what we might call a state. On the one side, there was always a great chasm between the tribes of Judah and Caleb and the northern Israeli tribes, and only David, for the first time, succeeded in gradually bridging the chasm through the unitary cult of Yahweh. We know precisely that this cult has at a very late time chosen for itself Jerusalem as its sole seat. Only from that moment have the Jewish people gotten a center, like Berlin or New York or Warsaw today. Because a people which does not want to work — the often hard work of building and maintaining a state — to work in mines, factories, in construction etc. Such a people will never establish a state but prefers to live in some other state where others work and he acts as an intermediary in business, a dealer in the best case, or in good German — a robber, a nomad who undertakes robbing raids just like in ancient times. Lively bravo!

Efforts are made to explain that so and so many Jews have been found that want to go there as farmers, workers, even soldiers. Laughter If these people really have this urge in themselves, Germany today needs these ideal men as turf cutters and coal miners; they could take part in building our water power plants, our lakes etc. The whole Zionist state will be nothing else than the perfect high school for their international criminals, and from there they will be directed. And every Jew will, of course, have immunity as a citizen of the Palestinian state Laughter and he will of course keep our citizenship. But when caught red-handed, he will not be a German Jew any longer but a citizen of Palestine. Laughter One can almost say that the Jew cannot help it because everything stems from his race. A Jew is everywhere a Jew; consciously or unconsciously, he resolutely represents the interests of his race. Thus we can see the two great differences between races: Aryanism means ethical perception of work and that which we today so often hear — socialism, community spirit, common good before own good. Jewry means egoistic attitude to work and thereby mammonism and materialism, the opposite of socialism.

He cannot do otherwise, whether he wants to or not. And thereby he is unable to create his own state because it requires a lot of social sense. He is only able to live as a parasite in the states of others. He lives as a race amongst other races, in a state within others states. And we can see very precisely that when a race does not possess certain traits which must be hereditary, it not only cannot create a state but must act as a destroyer, no matter if a given individual is good or evil. The Jewish path of destruction We can follow this fate of Jewry from the earliest prehistory. It is not important if there is truth in every word of the Bible. In general, it gives us at least an extract of the history of Jewry. We see how the Jews present themselves because the Jew wrote these words quite innocuously.

It did not appear to him as outrageous when a race, through cunning and deceit, invaded and despoiled other races, was always finally expelled and, unoffended, sought to repeat the same elsewhere. They pimped and haggled even when it came to their ideals, always ready to offer even their own families. We know that not long ago a gentleman was staying here, Sigmund Fraenkel, who has just written that it is quite unjust to accuse Jews of a materialistic spirit. One should only look at their sunny family life. However, this intimate family life did not prevent Grandfather Abraham from pimping off his own wife to the Pharaoh of Egypt in order to be able to do business. Laughter As was the grandfather, so was the father and so were the sons who never neglected their business. And you can be sure that they are not neglecting the business even as we speak. Who among you was a soldier, he will remember Galicia or Poland: There, at the train stations, these Abrahams were everywhere. Laughter and hand clapping They penetrated into other races for millennia.

And we know very well that wherever they stayed long enough symptoms of decay appeared and the peoples could do nothing else than to liberate themselves from the uninvited guest or to disappear themselves. Heavy plagues came over the nations, no less then ten in Egypt — the same plague we experience today firsthand — and finally the Egyptians lost their patience. When the chronicler describes that the Jews were suffering when they finally left, we know differently, for as soon as they were out, they began to long after coming back. Laughter It seems that they did not have it so badly. And just as you are not going to see this race voluntarily do it, so there was nothing left to the Egyptians but to force them. What hundreds of thousands of others do as a matter of course, means for the Jew another chapter of suffering and persecution. Still later, the Jew was able to infiltrate the then soaring Roman Empire. We can still see his traces in southern Italy. Already 250 years before Christ he was there in all places, and people began to avoid them.

Already, then and there, he made the most important decision and became a trader. From numerous Roman texts we know that he traded, like today, with everything from shoelaces to girls. Hear, hear And we know that the danger grew, and that the insurrection after the murder of Julius Caesar was mainly fomented by the Jews. The Jew knew even then how to make friends with the masters of the Earth. Only when they became shaky in their rule, he suddenly became a populist and discovered his wide open heart for the needs of the broad masses. So it was in Rome, as we know. We know that the Jew used Christianity, not out of love for Christ, but partly because he knew that this new religion questioned all earthly power and so it became an axe at the root of the Roman state, the state which was built on the authority of the public servant. He did the same 2000 years ago, and we know that this new Teaching was nothing else than a resurrection of the old truism that people in a state should have legal rights and, above all, that equal duties should give equal rights. This obvious Teaching was gradually turned against the Jew himself, as the similar Teaching of socialism has to turn on the Hebrew race today, its distorters and corrupters.

We know that throughout the middle Ages the Jew infiltrated all European states, behaving like a parasite, using new principles and ways which the people did not know then. And from a nomad he became a greedy and bloodthirsty robber of our time. And he went so far that people after people rebelled and attempted to shake him off. We know it is untrue when people say that the Jew was forced to this activity; he could easily acquire land. And he did acquire land but not to work it but in order to use it as a trade object, just as he does today. Our forefathers were wiser; they knew that land was holy and they excluded the Jew from it, Lively ovation and if the Jew ever had the intention to tend the land and build a state, he could easily have done so at the time when whole new continents were discovered. He could easily have done it if only he used a small part of his power, craftiness, cunning, brutality and ruthlessness, as well as some of his financial resources. Because if this power was sufficient to subdue whole peoples, it would have been more than sufficient to build their own state. If only he had had the basic condition for this, which is a will to work, but not in the sense of usurious trade but in the sense in which millions work in order to keep a state going.

Instead, we see him also today as a destroyer. In these days we see a great transformation: the Jew was once a Court Jew, submissive to his master he knew how to make the master pliable in order to dominate his subjects. For this purpose he whetted the appetites of these great men for unattainable things, extended the credit and soon turned them into debtors. In this way he himself got power over peoples. And he played this game with the same cruelty as, a few years later, the humanistic and philanthropic Jew whose wealth did not suffer at all when he showed his humanitarianism and his spirit of sacrifice to our people. Because he felt that the ground began to burn under his feet. The ethical duty to work Gradually, he also had to lead an existential struggle against the growing awakening and anger of the people. This forced him to lay his hands on the inner structure of the states if he wanted to remain the master of the peoples. We see the resulting destruction in three areas, namely those same three areas which were preserving and developing the states.

The first area was the fight against the principle of the ethical duty to work. The Jew had found another kind of work for himself where he could earn gold without practically moving a finger. He developed a principle which, throughout millennia, made it possible for him to amass fortunes without sweat and toil, unlike all other mortals, and above all — without taking risk. What is industrial capital? It is a constantly changing factor, a relative concept. Once it was a needle and thread, a workshop and a couple of cents in ready money which a tailor in Nurnberg possessed in the 13th century. It was a sum that made work possible, that is: tools, workshops and a certain amount of money in order to survive for a period of time. Gradually, this small workshop became a big factory. But workshops and tools, machines and factories have, per se, no value able to produce value but are a means to an end.

What produces value is work, and the few cents which made it possible to survive difficult times and buy some fabrics, multiplied through time, stand before us today — we call it Capital for continued operation in bad times, that is Working Capital. Here I want to emphasize one thing: Tools, workshop, machine, factory — or working capital, that is, industrial capital — against this you cannot fight at all. You can perhaps make sure that it is not abused but you cannot fight against it. This is the first major scam that one makes to our people, and they make it to distract us from the real fight, to pull it off from the capital which should and must be fought — from the loan and financial capital. Stormy bravo! This capital arises in a very different way. The smallest master craftsman was dependent on the fate that might affect him every day, on the general situation in the middle Ages, perhaps on the size of his city and its prosperity, the security in this city. Also today is this capital, that is, the industrial capital tied to the state and to the people, depending on the will of the people to work, but depending also on the possibility to procure raw materials in order to be able to offer work and find buyers who will really buy the product. And we know that a collapse of the state, under certain circumstances, renders the greatest values worthless, devalues them, as distinguished from the other capital, the finance and loan capital, which accrues interest very evenly without any regard to whether the owner, for example, of these 10,000 Mark himself passes away or not.

Никогда германский народ не вынашивал в себе враждебных чувств по отношению к народам России! Однако уже более 10 лет еврейские большевики пускались в непрерывные провокации поджечь не только Германию, но и всю Европу. В то время как никогда германские националисты не пытались перекинуть свое мировоззрение на Россию, еврейские большевики из Москвы наоборот только что и делали, что пытались подмять под себя не только нас, но и другие европейские народы; и не только идеологически, но и грубой военной силой. Последствия действий этого большевистского правительства порождают только хаос, нищету и голод во всех странах. Наоборот, я, уже 20 лет с минимальным вмешательством и без разрушения нашей промышленности, устанавливаю социализм в Германии, который не только полностью ликвидировал безработицу, но и позволяет рабочему человеку получать большую часть результатов своего труда. Успех этой политики экономической и социальной реконструкции нашего общества, путём систематического уничтожения разницы в классах и рангах, имеет в качестве конечной цели истинно общегосударственную общность всего народа. Поэтому только через силу я заставил себя в августе 1939 года послать своего министра иностранных дел Риббентропа в Москву в попытке вырваться из тисков английской изоляции. Я это сделал только перед лицом своей ответственности перед германским народом, но ещё больше в надежде достижения постоянной разрядки напряженности, и чтобы уменьшить жертвы, которые в противном случае от нас бы потребовались. В то время как Германия торжественно подтвердила в Москве, что перечисленные страны и территории «Эстония, Латвия, Финляндия и Бессарабия, равно как и Украина» , за исключением Литвы, не входят в интересы Германии, специальное соглашение было заключено секретный параграф «Пакта о Ненападении» на случай если Англии удастся заставить Польшу спровоцировать войну с Германией. И в этом случае тоже германские требования были сведены к существенным ограничениям и вне всякой связи с успехами германской армии.

Национал-социалисты, последствия этого «Пакта», которого я сам и хотел, и который был заключен в интересах германского народа, были очень и очень плачевными, в особенности, что касается германцев, проживающих в вышеупомянутых странах. Боле полумиллиона германских мужчин и женщин, большинство из которых крестьяне, ремесленники и рабочие, буквально за ночь вынуждены были бежать, чтобы ускользнуть от нового режима, который сначала угрожал им беспросветной нищетой, и, рано или поздно, — полным уничтожением. Тем не менее тысячи германцев исчезли совсем. Невозможно даже определить их судьбу и что с ними сейчас. Среди них было 160 тысяч граждан Германии. И на всё это я должен был закрыть глаза. Я был обязан молчать. В конце концов, это я сам захотел достигнуть разрядки напряжённости и, если возможно, то и полного мира с этим государством. Однако во время нашего общего вступления в Польшу, кремлёвские правители внезапно и в противоречии с договором также затребовали и Литву. Германия никогда не имела намерений оккупировать Литву.

И Германия не только оказалась не способной предъявить такой же ультиматум литовскому правительству, но и отвергла запрос Литвы прислать германские войска, потому что это требование было не в соответствии с целями германской политики. Но несмотря на это, я подчинился и этому новому требованию Кремля. Однако это было только началом шантажа и всё новых и новых вымогательств. Победа в Польше, которая была достигнута исключительно германскими войсками, предоставила мне возможность ещё раз обратиться к западным странам с предложением мира. Это предложение мира в очередной раз было отвергнуто, как и всегда, благодаря интернациональным усилиям еврейских поджигателей войны. В это время причиной такого отказа был тот факт, что Англия ещё надеялась мобилизовать против Германии коалицию европейских стран, включавшую Балканские страны и Советскую Россию. Поэтому Лондон решил послать Mr. Cripps посланником в Москву. Криппс получил чёткие инструкции любыми средствами втянуть Советскую Россию в проанглийскую коалицию. Английская пресса сообщала об этой миссии, поскольку её никак нельзя было скрыть.

Осенью 1939 года и весной 1940 года первые результаты этой миссии Криппса дали себя знать. В то время как Советская Россия предприняла попытку подчинить военной силой не только Финляндию, но и Балтийские страны, она вдруг начала обосновывать свои действия настолько же смехотворными, насколько они были и фальшивыми утверждениями, что, дескать, она должна «защитить эти страны от внешней угрозы». Эта «внешняя угроза» означала только Германию; никакая другая страна не имела доступа в балтийский бассейн и не могла там угрожать.

Hitler wrote in Mein Kampf: Quote regarding "The Big Lie" All this was inspired by the principle--which is quite true in itself--that in the big lie there is always a certain force of credibility; because the broad masses of a nation are always more easily corrupted in the deeper strata of their emotional nature than consciously or voluntarily, and thus in the primitive simplicity of their minds they are more readily fall victims to the big lie than the small lie, since they themselves often tell small lies in little matters but would be ashamed to resort to large-scale falsehoods. It would never come into their heads to fabricate colossal untruths, and they would not believe that others could have the impudence to distort truth so infamously. Even though the facts which prove this to be so may be brought clearly to their minds, they still doubt and waver and will continue to think that there may be some other explanation. For the grossly impudent lie always leaves traces behind it, even after it has been nailed down, a fact which is known to all expert liars in this world and to all who conspire together in tha art of lying. These people know only too well how to use falsehood for the basest purposes. From time immemorial, however, the Jews have known better than any others how falsehood and calumny can be exploited. Is not their very existance founded on one great lie, namely, that they are a religious community, whereas in reality they are a race?

And what a race!

Цитаты Гитлера на немецком

речь гитлера на немецком скачать mp3 или слушать онлайн бесплатно на Главная» Новости» Выступление гитлера на немецком кричит. Тегипоследняя речь гитлера текст, застольные речи гитлера книга, речь гитлера на немецком текст, переозвучка гитлера в бункере. Речь гитлера Речи гитлера на немецком с переводом. Документальные киноматериалы Предвыборная речь Гитлера Марш сторонников нацистской партии во время избирательной кампании Вальденбург, Германия. Речи гитлера Речи гитлера на немецком языке. Тэги: гитлер, речь, 1933, берлин Канцлер Германии Адольф Гитлер в своем рабочем кабинете.

Знаменитый фрагмент из фильма “Der Untergang” (рус. “Бункер”) — Речь Гитлера в бункере

Die Rede Adolf Hitlers – Речь Адольфа Гитлера « bumi bahagia / Glückliche Erde	Дюссельдорфская речь Первое выступление Гитлера 27 января 1932 на встрече с германскими промышленными магнатами в "Клубе индустрии", куда он был приглашен известным промышленником Фрицем Тиссеном.
Речь гитлера на немецком текст	Л. 130-158Заключительная речь рейхсканцлера Германии А. Гитлера на съезде НСДАП в Нюрнберге о политике национал-социалистов в Германии и опасностях большевизма.

Новости речь гитлера на немецком текст

Последняя речь Гитлера в бункере перед смертью. Почему её так долго скрывали от народа

"Why We Are Antisemites" - Text of Adolf Hitler's 1920 speech at the Hofbräuhaus

Цитаты Гитлера на немецком

Adolph Hitler SPEECH OF OCTOBER 6, 1939

Речь гитлера на немецком языке текст

Adolph Hitler SPEECH OF OCTOBER 6, 1939

Речь Гитлера на съезде НСДАП 1934

Последняя речь Гитлера в бункере перед смертью. Почему её так долго скрывали от народа

Цитаты Гитлера на немецком

Знаменитый фрагмент из фильма “Der Untergang” (рус. “Бункер”) — Речь Гитлера в бункере

Похожие новости: