На странице известного российского дизайнера Артемия Лебедева появился логотип Новосибирского метрополитена. Они перелопатили историю метро и только после этого пришли к выводу, что эту запомнившуюся букву М надо оставить. Эмблема Московского метро Лебедев. Дизайн-студия Артемия Лебедева сегодня сообщила о разработке логотипа столичного метро. Логотип метро до и после Лебедева – это две абсолютно разные эры в дизайне и восприятии этого символа городского транспорта.
В метро повесят новую схему от Студии Артемия Лебедева
Ситуация с Московским метрополитеном, как и шум вокруг логотипа Москвы, — пиар студии Лебедева в чистом виде, за которым вопрос о реальной работе не стоит. Студия Артемия Лебедева представила новый логотип метрополитена 9 сентября. Студия Артемия Лебедева опубликовала обновленный логотип московского метрополитена, который представляет собой красную букву «М». Сотрудники подземки считают пиаром новый логотип метро от студии Лебедева.
Как изменил логотип метро лебедев
Москва, ул. Полковая, дом 3 строение 1, помещение I, этаж 2, комната 21.
В-третьих, тут есть пути без рельсов, — пишет Лебедев. Во втором пункте дизайнер, судя по всему, имеет в виду траволаторы, проходящие под Малой Невой и соединяющие два вестибюля станции "Спортивная" — на Васильевском острове и Петроградской стороне. В комментариях к посту Лебедев также посетовал на рекламу в петербургском метро.
This letter is made up of several letters, just like a matryoshka doll.
The letter from the movie poster The letter made by the second contour The letter made by the third contour This is a really good example of how different versions of the same letter are born. If we see the outside contour as an inking, the proportions of the letter change. This becomes especially important when the letter is printed in two colors, red and black, like in the example below. Here is a letter of appreciation given to comrade Krugly for his work on construction of the Metro: This way the red letter simply loses its serifs. The visual rendering of the logo was not established by the time the Metro opened.
This allowed the proportions of the letter to constantly change due to a number of reasons, one of which is given above. The first illuminated letters at station entrances quickly began to malfunction. They were replaced by new ones, but their production was not centralized: managers of Metro stations independently ordered their production at different companies. Entrance to Arbatskaya station, circa 1935 Entrance to Arbatskaya station, circa 1938. A number of letters around the entrance was replaced by one letter on top overlooking Arbatskaya ploshchad Entrance to Komsomolskaya station, circa 1935 Entrance to Komsomolskaya station, circa 1937.
Two types of neon illumination from the 1930s: The letter used in print also received more pronounced serifs and was printed this way on tickets and tokens up until the mid-1960s. The next milestone in the history of the logo was in the 1960s when the letter started to lose its serifs, both in street signs and in print. In the same years the attitude towards the Metro changed as well: above-ground entrances stopped being a mandatory part of a proper station and entrances to some stations were built into underground pedestrian tunnels. In these cases, stelas with illuminated letters which had no serifs were installed near entrances to such tunnels. This is the image that survived to the present day, apart from an updated illumination technology.
It is for this reason that the existing street logo has no serifs. Logo in front of the entrance to Pushkinskaya and Gorkovskaya stations, 1970s Logo in front of the entrance to Kitay-Gorod station, 2014 By the end of the 1970s the serifs returned, this time together with a tunnel-shaped outline which was previously often used in the design of Metro-related documents. Illustration from a book on Metro safety procedures, 1935 Illustration from a Metro booklet, 1950s—1970s Emblem approved at the end of the 1970s Since its inception, the proportions of the letter were quite flexible. With the introduction of the tunnel-shaped semicircle the variation increased even more: nobody knew the exact proportions, yet now there were many other organizations providing equipment for the Metro who had to use the letter. It was often drawn as a simple M in a semicircle.
However, the tunnel outline never made it to street stands and station entrances. The tunnel-shaped semicircle however still remained on the back of Troika fare cards. Here is a Ediniy card and the back of a Troika card 2013 : Throughout its history the logo has been replaced numerous times which, however, was barely noticed by the residents due to abundance of different designs already in place. But one thing always remained the same: the red letter M. This historical overview brings us to one idea: the logo has to remain the same, it has to be the old letter M.
What it needs though is to be standardized, which would ensure that the emblem is recognizable by foreigners, which would make it one of the definitive symbols of the city, just like London Underground. Which would give our Metro a unified and recognizable style. Which would make sure that the symbol on a map matches the symbol on a station entrance.
В комментариях к своему посту Лебедев отметил, что хвалить Петербург за отсутствие рекламы поводов тоже нет: «Никакой рекламы — это точно не про Питер. Хуже Питера по засранности рекламой только Киев».
Мэрия Москвы: затраты на разработку нового логотипа московского метро составили 1 руб.
Если учесть, что символ метрополитена менялся неоднократно, и за это не платили и сотой доли цены этого контракта, то становится понятно, насколько это бессмысленная трата», — объяснил парламентарий. Сердюк считает, что эти деньги стоило потратить на повышение безопасности метрополитена, а «не заниматься бутафорией и перерисовыванием одной буквы». Кроме того, он отметил, что шрифты устаревают за шесть-семь лет, и каждый раз тратить такие суммы на новое начертание логотипа «слишком дорогое удовольствие, которое надо пресекать». В мэрии заявили, что 232 миллиона рублей были выделены на улучшение имиджа общественного транспорта в целом.
То есть здесь может идти речь и о коррупции. Часть конкурсов при этом не объявлялась официально например, на разработку логотипа городов Сатка, Ижевск, Ярославль и т. Но своего развития обвинения не получили. Тему просто «заболтали». А сам Лебедев глубокомысленно заявил, что если его попросят выбрать между госзакупками на 10 млн рублей или взять 10 коммерческих клиентов по 1 млн рублей, то он выберет второе. Всё потому, как в госструктурах сидят не бренд-менеджеры, с которыми он привык общаться, а чиновники, — и c этими чиновниками сложно договориться. То есть, товарищ проговорился и дал понять, что без взяток, распилов и откатов никак с властью не договоришься? Впрочем, он уже давно забыл следить за своим языком. В своем блоге на Youtube он назвал монумент «Родина-мать зовет!
Первую премию так никто не получил, но лучшим признали проект архитектора Бибикова, который получил вторую премию в 1000 рублей. Потом создать логотип доверили молодым архитекторам, разработавшим проекты первых станций метро — Ивану Таранову и Надежде Быковой. Так и появилась та самая красная буква «М» с узнаваемыми засечками. В разное время у неё возникали дополнительные элементы, к примеру, синяя дуга вокруг, символизирующая тоннель.
Но чтобы не обижать конкурсантов, вручила авторам двух лучших проектов по 1000 рублей, а еще двоим — по 500 рублей. В итоге комиссия доверила работу профессиональным архитекторам. Автором логотипа московского метро стал архитектор Иван Таранов, он же вместе с женой Надеждой Быковой разработал проект самой первой станции московского метро «Сокольники». Над станциях появилась большая буква «М» и впридачу световая громоздкая надпись «Метро». Все элементы оформления были объемными с электрической подсветкой в ночное время. Библиотека им. Ленина, 1935. Пресс-служба Московского метрополитена Библиотека им. Пресс-служба Московского метрополитена Впоследствии от массивной конструкции со словом «Метро» отказались, чтобы не отвлекать внимание от архитектуры вестибюлей станций. Оставили лишь символ с литерой «М», который уже стали узнавать жители столицы, пояснили Russia Beyond ведущие специалисты центра профориентации московского метро Андрей Комаров и Михаил Шульга.
Еще по теме
- Студия Лебедева представила новый логотип столичного метрополитена – Пронедра
- Создание логотипа Московского метро
- Что еще почитать
- Портал правительства Москвы
- Найдите пять отличий: Артемий Лебедев создал новый логотип московского метро
метро знак
Полковая, дом 3 строение 1, помещение I, этаж 2, комната 21.
However, while the work on the new logo was under way, there had to be a way to mark station entrances. The design of some station entrances already included this text. When the logo was finally finished and the technology of night-time illumination tested, the new emblems were installed along the old text signs which were also illuminated. Entrance to Arbatskaya station, January 1935 Entrance to Arbatskaya station, May 1935 As the logo was designed after the stations were completed, the design of the stations allowed to space for the emblem. On some stations installing such a large letter was outright impossible, so it was narrowed down instead of scaling down, which would have been a more logical solution. This was the first step in the long way to the problem of the variety of the logos. Throughout almost all of the Metro history the street emblem was entirely independent from the logo that was employed on paper. According to the surviving data, this version of the letter was created by S. Kravets who designed Dvorets Sovetov station and was one of the prominent architects of Metroproekt.
The idea remained the same—a red letter M with serifs—but the proportions were different. Emblem from one of the posters for the Yest Metro! Neon tubing highlighted internal contours of the letter which was depicted in printed versions of the logo. In the 1930s the letter was often drawn with these outlines, yet their number and designs were always different. This negligence played a cruel joke with the logo. This letter is made up of several letters, just like a matryoshka doll. The letter from the movie poster The letter made by the second contour The letter made by the third contour This is a really good example of how different versions of the same letter are born. If we see the outside contour as an inking, the proportions of the letter change. This becomes especially important when the letter is printed in two colors, red and black, like in the example below. Here is a letter of appreciation given to comrade Krugly for his work on construction of the Metro: This way the red letter simply loses its serifs.
The visual rendering of the logo was not established by the time the Metro opened. This allowed the proportions of the letter to constantly change due to a number of reasons, one of which is given above. The first illuminated letters at station entrances quickly began to malfunction. They were replaced by new ones, but their production was not centralized: managers of Metro stations independently ordered their production at different companies. Entrance to Arbatskaya station, circa 1935 Entrance to Arbatskaya station, circa 1938. A number of letters around the entrance was replaced by one letter on top overlooking Arbatskaya ploshchad Entrance to Komsomolskaya station, circa 1935 Entrance to Komsomolskaya station, circa 1937. Two types of neon illumination from the 1930s: The letter used in print also received more pronounced serifs and was printed this way on tickets and tokens up until the mid-1960s. The next milestone in the history of the logo was in the 1960s when the letter started to lose its serifs, both in street signs and in print. In the same years the attitude towards the Metro changed as well: above-ground entrances stopped being a mandatory part of a proper station and entrances to some stations were built into underground pedestrian tunnels. In these cases, stelas with illuminated letters which had no serifs were installed near entrances to such tunnels.
This is the image that survived to the present day, apart from an updated illumination technology. It is for this reason that the existing street logo has no serifs. Logo in front of the entrance to Pushkinskaya and Gorkovskaya stations, 1970s Logo in front of the entrance to Kitay-Gorod station, 2014 By the end of the 1970s the serifs returned, this time together with a tunnel-shaped outline which was previously often used in the design of Metro-related documents. Illustration from a book on Metro safety procedures, 1935 Illustration from a Metro booklet, 1950s—1970s Emblem approved at the end of the 1970s Since its inception, the proportions of the letter were quite flexible. With the introduction of the tunnel-shaped semicircle the variation increased even more: nobody knew the exact proportions, yet now there were many other organizations providing equipment for the Metro who had to use the letter. It was often drawn as a simple M in a semicircle. However, the tunnel outline never made it to street stands and station entrances. The tunnel-shaped semicircle however still remained on the back of Troika fare cards. Here is a Ediniy card and the back of a Troika card 2013 : Throughout its history the logo has been replaced numerous times which, however, was barely noticed by the residents due to abundance of different designs already in place. But one thing always remained the same: the red letter M.
This historical overview brings us to one idea: the logo has to remain the same, it has to be the old letter M. What it needs though is to be standardized, which would ensure that the emblem is recognizable by foreigners, which would make it one of the definitive symbols of the city, just like London Underground. Which would give our Metro a unified and recognizable style. Which would make sure that the symbol on a map matches the symbol on a station entrance. Soviet architects including those who created the original emblem were routinely sent to London and Paris to adopt foreign experience of underground construction. It is entirely possible that the authors of our logo were inspired by the Paris logo which at the time looked like a red letter M with thick serifs which was inscribed in the shape similar to the London Underground logo. But the only way to explain the prominent serifs of the letter is that it was created by architects, not artists. In any case, the serifs are an important part of the logo which needs to be maintained in contrast to the semicircle we discussed before which is obviously a transient element and can be easily discarded. Some of station entrance models from the 1930s feature a letter M that is somewhat similar to the one we have today. Maybe, the architects simply chose to improve this symbol.
Of course, this overview gave us an understanding of how the logo was conceived, how it evolved in different time periods and what were its main features. After all, already by that time there were several logos in existence, as we discussed before. The first version of the London Underground station logo, 1908 The uniform badge worn by employees of the London General Omnibus Company which merged with the Underground Electric Railways Company of London in 1910 The station name sign by Edward Johnson, 1921 The updated London Transport sign, 1933 Redesign, the new logo was called Roundel-1972 and was used for all transportation in the city, 1980s And this is exactly the task we have before us: to carefully update the Moscow Metro logo, return to its historic image while maintaining its visibility, to create a unified image that will not be changed year after year under the influence of transient design trends. We can try to imagine what the logo looks like in the minds of Moscow residents by combining all the existing shapes together. It looks something like this: First I was simply consulting Yegor and Ludwig, I told them about the history of the logo, how it evolved and why. But ultimately it just so happened that I was the one to work on the design. By this time, Yegor has already created his version of the letter M whose thin pronounced serifs were just begging to be enlarged.
Деньги потрачены на работы из этого списка. Где я утверждал, что нет откатов и распилов? Вообще ни я не ты там свечку не держали, и откаты и роспилы небольше чем наши фантазии. У тебя есть какие-то конкретные сведения о том кто и сколько попилил на этом.
Размер премий победителям всероссийского конкурса, объявленного метропроектом, был немалый, 2 тысячи рублей мог получить в то время преподаватель вуза за полгода работы. Однако даже предложенное высокое вознаграждение не решило проблемы, специальная комиссия отвергла все 97 присланных вариантов. Но чтобы не обижать конкурсантов, вручила авторам двух лучших проектов по 1000 рублей, а еще двоим — по 500 рублей. В итоге комиссия доверила работу профессиональным архитекторам. Автором логотипа московского метро стал архитектор Иван Таранов, он же вместе с женой Надеждой Быковой разработал проект самой первой станции московского метро «Сокольники». Над станциях появилась большая буква «М» и впридачу световая громоздкая надпись «Метро». Все элементы оформления были объемными с электрической подсветкой в ночное время. Библиотека им. Ленина, 1935. Пресс-служба Московского метрополитена Библиотека им.
Логотип Московского метро
Логотип Московского метрополитена Артемий Лебедев. Московский метрополитен логотип до и после Лебедева. Логотип не претерпел радикальных изменений: Лебедев лишь убрал синюю линию вокруг буквы «М». Дизайн-студия Артемия Лебедева представила официальный логотип московского метро, который ранее не был жестко стандартизирован и многократно подвергался спонтанным и бесконтрольным трансформациям. «К открытию Большой кольцевой линии в студии задизайнили привязанную к географии промосхему метро. Предлагаю новый логотип, дешевле чем у Артемия, всего за 189 млн рублей. Логотип Московского метрополитена Лебедев стоимость.
Дизайнер Артемий Лебедев придумал новый логотип Новосибирского метрополитена
Последний логотип был разработал студией Артемий Лебедева в 2014 году. Реакция пользователей соцсетей и фотожабы на новый логотип московского метрополитена от Студии Артемия Лебедева. Идея переделать эмблему Московского метро уже давно витала в воздухе, ведь у. Реакция пользователей соцсетей и фотожабы на новый логотип московского метрополитена от Студии Артемия Лебедева. — Мы выступаем против такого быстрого, можно сказать конвейерного производства и жонглирования логотипами городов и знаковых объектов, как это делается в студии г-на Лебедева.